Posts Tagged ‘democracy’

Democracy And Liberty

August 15th, 2014, posted in COMiCS, MESSAGEs, Scarface'S DIARY, UNiVERSE

Two Wolves, Wolves,Democracy,dinner,vote,lamb,well armed,liberty,sheep, wolves vs sheep,lamp,democracy is,liberty is,


The Men Who Would Lead Pakistan

May 11th, 2013, posted in Ink On PAPER, PAKiSTAN

The current Pakistani government, led by the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), ends its term on March 18. The government is expected to announce a date for elections before the end of its term. Once the election date is set, the National Assembly will automatically dissolve and a caretaker government will assume charge for up to ninety days before the election.

On polling day, Pakistanis will elect 272 representatives to the National Assembly and 577 representatives to provincial assemblies in Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, and Balochistan. The political party that secures 172 seats in the National Assembly, either independently or in coalition with other parties, will lead the next government.

Politics is a riddled and opaque game in Pakistan, a point driven home by former politician-turned preacher Tahir-ul Qadri, who despite his absence from Pakistani politics for eight years, was able to lead a 50,000-strong march into Islamabad last month pushing for electoral reforms – and actually won the government’s commitment on some counts. Things are about to get even more complicated as the country prepares for national elections.

The campaign landscape is littered with the typical coterie of political party stalwarts, children of political dynasties, technocrats, and current and former army generals looking to shape the elections outcome. But three individuals stand out as possible leaders of Pakistan’s next government – Asif Ali Zardari, Nawaz Sharif, and Imran Khan. Zardari and Sharif represent the old guard of politics – Zardari the widower of a political dynast and Sharif an industrialist from the country’s breadbasket of Punjab. Khan claims to represent a new political wave, seeking to capture the desires of roughly 18 million new voters, young people who grew up watching Khan win cricket matches for the Pakistani national team. The profiles of the three men who would lead Pakistan promise elections that will be as entertaining as they will be historic.

Asif Ali Zardari, President of Pakistan and Co-Chairman of the Pakistan People’s Party

Who is he? Asif Ali Zardari has been a fixture in Pakistani politics since 1987, when he married Benazir Bhutto, the country’s first female Prime Minister in 1988 and again in 1993. He hails from Sindh but is originally of Baloch ethnic origin. Because of his complicated past, checkered with imprisonment, exile and allegations of corruption, Zardari was viewed as an “accidental president” when he came into power in 2008 following his wife’s assassination. As a result, his emergence as a masterful strategist of a complicated coalition was a surprise to many. He shares the PPP chairmanship with son Bilawal.

What does he want? Zardari’s presidential term ends in September, several months after the national elections are expected. It is only fair to presume he wants to serve another term as President. The PPP’s strength in the Senate, where it won a majority in the March 2012 elections, will help but Zardari won’t be able to take home the prize so easily. An electoral college consisting of the Senate, provincial assemblies and the National Assembly actually elect the president. Zardari’s chances will be determined by both national and provincial assembly elections taking place this year. He also likely wants to keep benefitting from the financial opportunities available to Pakistani politicians in power. But beyond personal power and money, Zardari also seeks to maintain PPP’s strength so that his son, Bilawal, can eventually assume charge and continue the Bhutto family political legacy.

Pro: Zardari’s number one strength remains his ability to make deals in a tough coalition environment, which is expected to continue in the next government. Whether it was meeting Muttahida Quami Movement demands to reverse fuel price hikes in order to stay in the coalition, the unanimous passage of the historic 18th amendment devolving power to the provinces, or re-opening NATO routes closed after a NATO airstrike killed several Pakistani soldiers, he wasn’t too proud to beg to get what he wanted.

Con: Everyone seems to be working against him. Among his “enemies” are the military, judiciary, opposition parties, the Saudis – and the list goes on. Another five years of Zardari could also mean another five years of attempts to unseat him with corruption cases at the Supreme Court, soft coup attempts by the military, and gridlock on economic reform.

Nawaz Sharif, President of Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz

Who is he? Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif is the President of the Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz (PML-N). A former two-time Prime Minister, Sharif is also a Punjab-based industrialist whose family’s real estate and agriculture holdings are valued at over $100 million. Like Zardari, he has strained ties with the military and judiciary, institutions that aided his eventual ouster in 1999, ironic since Sharif got his start under military dictator General Zia-ul Haq in the 1980s. His two tenures as Prime Minister (1990-1993 and 1997-1999) each straddled the governments of Benazir Bhutto, making for an intense rivalry between the PML-N and PPP that continues to this day, despite recent collaboration between the two parties.

What does he want? The third time’s the charm – or at least Sharif hopes. Another go at Prime Minister would not only allow Sharif to make history – no one else has held the position three times – but it would also bring him back into the mainstream political fold. After Musharraf removed him from power in 1999, Sharif remained in political exile in Saudi Arabia until 2007. Since then, under his leadership the PML-N opposition has criticized the current government’s policies but within apparently self-imposed boundaries, probably to avoid being viewed as “derailing democracy” at a time when disruptions to civilian rule are extremely unpopular.

Pro: Sharif brings along with him the most organized party structure in the country. Even though it lacks the national base that PPP boasts, the PML-N has focused on improving internal governance, strengthening development projects in key constituencies, identifying electable candidates to run on the PML-N ticket, and engaging new young and middle class voters.   

Con: He talks to terrorists – sort of. One of the largest vote banks for the right of center PML-N is southern Punjab, a hotbed of violent extremist activity in madrassas run by jihadist and sectarian outfits such as Sipah-e-Sihaba Pakistan, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, Jaish-e-Muhammad, and Lashkar-e-Taiba. The PML-N cannot ignore the massive base these groups yield in Punjab, which elects 148 out of 272 National Assembly members. In 2010, PML-N Provincial Law Minister Rana Sanaullah reportedly visited the Sipah-e-Sihaba madrassa and met with its leader while campaigning in by-elections. Such relations suggest that a PML-N-led government could be more inclined to offer unsavory characters various concessions in exchange for votes, keeping the peace or achieving other objectives for that matter.

Imran Khan, Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf

Who is he? Imran Khan is a former captain of the Pakistan cricket team, philanthropist, and now chairman of his own political party, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). His claim to represent anew style of politics is somewhat disingenuous. He follows a long line of South Asian celebrities turned politicians whose personage offers unquestionable advantages in an otherwise complicated political landscape. But his popular appeal is legitimate. Khan has managed to deliver thousands of people at numerous countrywide rallies around the 2013 elections despite the fact that PTI only ever held one seat in the National Assembly..

What does he want? The PTI’s meteoric rise in popularity over the past couple of years has raised suspicions that it enjoys some kind of support from the security establishment, and therefore would simply serve as a mouthpiece for military interests in domestic and foreign affairs. But a simpler answer is perhaps more logical – that Khan has truly tapped into a desire for change in Pakistan, similar to the circumstances surrounding the Qadri march on Islamabad in January, and is keen to see how far it will take him.

Pro: Khan’s call for an overhaul of status quo politics in Pakistan is a welcome one, particularly among urban, educated middle class voters in Punjab. The party manifesto calls for an end to “VIP culture” in Pakistan, noting that corruption at the highest levels has made democratic institutions “the focus of public scorn and ridicule.” It is hard to disagree with PTI’s message when Pakistan consistently ranks among the world’s most corrupt nations.

Con: Despite PTI’s existence as a party for almost sixteen years now, both the party’s manifesto and its leader are untested. Rumors of its internal leadership challenges, weak presence at the provincial level, and Khan’s periodic media stunts (i.e. the march to Waziristan), should raise questions about PTI’s ability to deliver on its ambitious agenda for change.

As the competition between Zardari, Sharif and Khan unfolds over the next several months, other personalities and institutions will also contend to shape and influence the electoral outcome. Let’s not forget the likes of Tahir-ul Qadri, activist Supreme Court Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, the military, and even the media, all of whom have a say in who leads the next government. In a place where personalities dominate politics, Zardari, Sharif and Khan clearly stand out, but vested interests combined with the rise of new forces of change can put a serious spanner in the works.

Shamila N. Chaudhary is a South Asia analyst at the Eurasia Group and a senior fellow at the New America Foundation. She served as director for Pakistan and Afghanistan at the White House National Security Council from 2010-2011.


Why Cant I Vote No One ?

May 10th, 2013, posted in Ink On PAPER, PAKiSTAN

Why Cant I Vote No One ?,vote,Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP),Election Commission of Pakistan,ECP,Pakistan,Election,11 may,ElectionVote,11MayElectionVote,VoteElection,none of the above,no one,pti,mqm,muslim league,muslims,pakistani

An Article Must Read :

You know what, Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), I wanted to exercise the ‘none of the above’ option in my vote but you backed out by deciding against introducing it.

I don’t know, nor do I care if I was alone in rejoicing the commission’s decision to put in that option in the ballot paper, because for the first time, I thought I would go and vote my heart out.

I would rather go to the ballot and tell the world that none of these people represent me. This is so much better than just sitting back and not casting one’s vote at all.

For the first time, I thought I had a chance to vent my anger and my disagreement with the people for whom I was nothing but a vote, the people who would refuse to even recognise me after getting elected as my ‘representative’. No sir, this was not against the ‘system’. It was against the people who have been infecting this system, not letting it grow for decades.

Nor was it against ‘democratic norms’. Why would it be?

I have the right to reject anyone, or all who I believe are incapable of representing me.

Why would anyone, in a democracy, not let me reject all those who I believe were not even aware of my name, my needs, who do not share my problems and were least bothered to share them?

Some argued that run off polls resulting from more people exercising the ‘none of the above’ option would prove an extra financial burden. Sir, this is our money that is being spent on electing our future representatives, the people who we have to entrust with making laws for us to make our lives happier.

Let it be spent a hundred times until we get the right person. A wrong choice would deprive us of our hard earned money by corruption anyway.

Others, particularly the politicians who felt threatened by the ECP’s decisions, said it would be ‘anti-democracy’ and would undermine the politicians. They said no one has a right to reject in a democracy.

These self-appointed politicians need to know that more than ‘accepting’, it is the rejecting that people have the right to. So this time again, I will not vote because I do not want to vote for the ‘lesser evil’.

Why Cant I Vote No One ?,vote,Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP),Election Commission of Pakistan,ECP,Pakistan,Election,11 may,ElectionVote,11MayElectionVote,VoteElection,none of the above,no one,pti,mqm,muslim league,muslims,pakistani